Tag: digital communication
-
Short explainer – Virtual members? How political party membership is changing.
Virtual membership of political parties has become an increasingly important aspect of party organization and campaign strategy in recent years. Virtual members are individuals who affiliate themselves with a particular party but do not have a formal membership status. While virtual membership can be a valuable resource for parties, allowing them to reach a wider audience and mobilize supporters without requiring a formal commitment, it can also pose challenges. Virtual members may be less committed or involved than traditional members, and it can be difficult for parties to effectively mobilize and engage them. Additionally, virtual membership can create confusion about the level of support for a party, as it is not always clear how many of a party’s virtual members would actually vote for them in an election. Parties should be mindful of these potential implications as they seek to engage and mobilize supporters through virtual membership.
-
Short explainer – Janus-faced campaigning. What is it and why does it matter in the social media age?
Janus-faced campaigning refers to the practice of presenting different messages or positions to different audiences in order to appeal to a wider range of voters. This can be seen as a negative practice, as it can be seen as dishonest or insincere and lead to mistrust and cynicism among voters. The power of social media has further complicated the issue of Janus-faced campaigning, as it has made it easier for candidates and parties to present different messages to different groups of voters and spread misinformation or propaganda. It is important for candidates and parties to be transparent and honest in their use of social media in order to maintain trust and integrity in the electoral process.
-
Short explainer – The decline of parties thesis and why it matters
The decline of parties thesis suggests that political parties, which have traditionally played a central role in democratic systems, are losing their influence and relevance. This trend is often attributed to a variety of factors, including the increasing individualization of society, the rise of social media and other forms of digital communication, and the increasing importance of issues that cut across traditional party lines. The decline of parties has significant implications for democratic systems, including the rise of populist movements, the increasing influence of special interest groups and wealthy individuals, and a decrease in the stability and effectiveness of democratic systems.
Tristan Hotham
accountability, coalitions, Decline of Parties Thesis, democratic systems, digital communication, effectiveness, electoral process, groups, individualization, Interests, issues, loyalty, oligarchy, party lines, party membership, political parties, political process, populist movements, representation, Social Media, society, special interest groups, stability, values, voters, wealthy individuals -
Short explainer – Why do politicians and parties use social media?
From campaign ads to viral memes, politicians and political parties are using social media to win elections and govern in the digital age. But what drives their use of these platforms, and how do they effectively connect with voters and shape public opinion? Our article delves into the strategies and tactics politicians and parties use to leverage social media, from influencer marketing to targeted advertising. We also examine the potential risks and challenges of using these platforms, and the role social media plays in shaping the modern political landscape.
Tristan Hotham
campaign advertising, Campaigning, digital communication, Facebook, facebook adverts, influencer marketing, Instagram), online reputation, political branding, political messaging, political parties, politicians, Politics, public image, public relations, Social Media, social media platforms (e.g. Twitter, social media strategy, twitter, voter engagement -
Short explainer – Should we entrust politicians with the power of social media?
From Twitter tirades to Instagram selfies, politicians are increasingly turning to social media to connect with voters and shape their public image. But with the vast array of platforms and strategies available, should we entrust politicians to use social media given ever more powerful capacities.
Tristan Hotham
Artificial intelligence (AI), bias, campaign advertising, digital communication, ethical implications, Facebook, influencer marketing, Instagram), Misinformation, online reputation, political campaigns, political messaging, politicians, Politics, prejudice, propaganda, public image, public relations, safeguards, Social Media, social media platforms (e.g. Twitter, social media strategy, voter engagement